Thank you, Mr. Minister.
It is clear from your statements that bijuralism is a pillar of Supreme Court law and, of course, we are going to continue to go along with that very basic and fundamental principle.
Madame Boivin questioned sections 5 and 6. She said there was perhaps a dissonance between the French and English versions. Of course, very prudently we obtained Mr. Justice Binnie's opinion in this regard.
With regard to our provisions in clauses 471 and 472, have you spoken to legal experts to determine whether these interpretative amendments will preserve Quebec's civil law tradition, it being so important to us?