Yes. Thank you very much for your kind comments.
To get directly to the answers, in terms of the travel tightening, KINSA supports it.
In addition to work with KINSA, I spent five years on the board of ECPAT, which is based out of Thailand and is the largest NGO dealing with the commercial sexual exploitation of children. Child sex tourism—CST is the acronym we used—is a very serious problem.
As we tighten our laws here and as we become increasingly vigilant here, those who are predisposed to abuse children will look for other places to go. The corollary of us tightening up at home is that we create greater risks from our travellers abroad, and these restrictions on travel, the information requirements on travel, are actually a necessary corollary so that we don't actually just clean up our backyard by dumping our problems somewhere else. That's why I support it.
Yes, it will enhance our ability to work productively with Interpol and other international and national law enforcement agencies in other countries, because information about movement—and I know there are people here on the committee with police experience—gives us information. That's intelligence, and it can productively assist us in preventing and apprehending. Those are crucial pieces of the puzzle as well.