I want to talk to you, Mr. Gilhooly, just for a moment.
You were talking about the proportionality principle. One of the things I see when I look at some of the changes is that not only are there minimums, but there are increased maximums as well. For example, sexual interference on indictment goes from 10 years to 14 years, and I could go down the list.
Do you think that by moving the goalposts on both ends you will be adjusting that principle? If you don't think so, then what do you think the solution is?