To that question directly, treatment engaged in under coercion is generally less effective, often completely ineffective. I would say no, it doesn't really make sense. I think that to put your resources where they're going to be most effective, you have people volunteer to take those courses. If they choose not to, then that comes under consideration at the level of parole in terms of their risk. I think we have that covered.
You can't force people to take programs that don't exist. In Alberta, for example, a sex offender can't be forced to take sex offender treatment. It simply isn't there. You'd have to put them in the community, in a hospital, because that's where the treatment is in Alberta.
On the other issue of breaching, this is again a question of judicial discretion for me, in terms of what the breach is. What are the conditions? What level of risk does that breach pose to the community? There could be a range of conditions on a release, some of which may include not having access to a cellphone. The individual may need to have a cellphone for work, for other purposes. If they breach that condition—