If I may, just very briefly, when we look at the most serious and the most heinous cases, we're not talking about 90 days or six months for those. Routinely there are very lengthy sentences for those cases. But when we're looking at reasonable hypotheticals from a constitutional perspective, we're not talking about the six-month sentence, the minimum here, for a heinous repeat offender.
We're talking about some of those reasonable hypotheticals that the courts describe that are much less than that. A 21-year-old who might be sent a picture from his 16-year-old girlfriend or asked for that picture might fall under some of these provisions. So one can imagine some hypothetical situations that are much less serious than those situations being used to sell this notion, and that's where the unfairness on constitutionality really arises.