I would add only that I think that's a proper interpretation of how the RCMP would exercise its obligations, which is to only.... The act is very clear: it must contain only information that has previously been disclosed.
The consequence of the amendment might actually create operational challenges for the RCMP to operationalize the bill. Are we now going to have a requirement to assess, before we publish anything, whether an individual whom we have no control over is actually going to try to use this information to identify victims? Also, what consequence does that impose on the commissioner's obligations? Additionally, if there's non-compliance with this provision, I guess the question is, what is the accountability mechanism if there is non-compliance?