Could I answer that? The fact is that you know some of the history of minimum mandatory sentencing laws, for instance, and that the judges haven't necessarily honoured them. Quite frankly, they would check with it being contrary to the charter. So it's hard to say what a judge.... If we asked a number of judges to give us an opinion, it doesn't necessarily mean that when it goes before a judge it will be upheld.
I think we've done our due diligence in looking at our perspective of the fact that it is at the discretion of the judge. That's why I felt comfortable with the fact that we weren't giving a mandatory time limit on the eligibility, because then we were forcing the judges' hand. We were dictating to them what their judgment shall be.