All right.
I think it is useful to study the system. As we heard at the committee's last meeting, it is useful to consider the justice system as a whole. I found that your presentations were very interesting because they dealt with integrating the bill into the system as a whole.
My next question is about a technical point. I am taking advantage of the fact that there is a lawyer present. I do not know whether Mr. Paterson is also a lawyer.
I would like to know if you looked for a definition of the expression “in respect of the same event or series of events”. Is that in the Criminal Code? How have the courts interpreted the expression “in respect of the same event or series of events”? What do you think of including this expression in the bill and in the Criminal Code?