Certainly.
The impetus in the beginning started with the Canadian Bar Association's resolutions. They had provided some language over the course of time, and it was an issue that was interesting and important to me when I became a member of Parliament. So I spoke with members of the Yukon branch of the Canadian Bar Association, who were direct advocates and involved heavily at the national level. They provided some context and background for what they were looking at.
Of course, in the evolution of my bill, which had multiple iterations throughout that time, we had drafting experts look at it to evolve it and make sure we weren't creating any unintended consequences.
Also, all the while of course I was continuing to consult with CanFASD and FASSY.
A host of national groups and organizations have attended a number of the conferences where we've been able to put forward iterations of my bill, so that we could look at to see if it was reaching not only the right legal language, but effectively, for lack of a better term, the trade language that's used and make sure the legal verbiage was matching that. I would be guessing, but it was north of 100 different groups and organizations that I consulted with.