You are actually saying that perhaps the director of public prosecutions should be at this table. Could it be noted that we would like to hear from the people who are able to answer our questions, especially when something in the supplementary estimates is fully linked to the budget of the director of public prosecutions? If not, what is the use of having witnesses who tell us that they cannot answer? I understand and respect that, but we are talking about an additional $3.8 million. There aren't a lot of similar amounts at the Department of Justice. We are talking about a $10.9 million portfolio.
The first point, for the Supreme Court, is linked to parking. I think everyone understood, but why $3.8 million? Have they moved? What is the idea behind the move? No one can tell us. It is a bit odd.
If they cannot give us an answer, that's fine.