Thank you, Mr. Casey.
The next questioner is from the Conservative Party, and that's me.
First of all, thank you for coming.
To Madame Boivin's point, I've been active on the government operations committee, and we're talking about estimates. One of the recommendations coming from that committee is that if you're looking at the estimates and there's a specific issue that you have, it's helpful for the department to know. I used to be on the industry committee, and there was a long list of estimates. If you didn't specifically let them know that you were going to be asking a question in that area, often the staff member responsible for that area was not in the room, which was always a frustration for me. I've tried to start providing information. That's part of a report that's gone of 11 recommendations that the government has accepted and is working on.
I'm just taking my own Conservative slot of five minutes, which I have provided in advance.
The one thing I looked at is the report on plans and priorities. We talk about what the means were, which was the $657 million, and then we look at planned spending for this year at $748 million, which is a $90-million change. I need an explanation of what that is. Then we go back, in planning, for 2014-15 and 2015-16, to the $626 million and the $617 million. I'm assuming those are what the main estimates would look like, based on that.
Could you explain those two differences for me?