I'm just going to add that Bill C-35 is proposing a very specific, narrow set of amendments to address a very specific type of issue. I think the comment you're raising has maybe more to do with the whole area of the provisions, because Bill C-35 is just maintaining a similar approach to what's there right now. The reference to subsection 429(2) applies to all of those other provisions, whereas Bill C-35 is only going in to do something very narrow.
Perhaps the issue you're raising is why you have it in both places. It's in both places right now with the existing sections 445 and 429, and Bill C-35 is just maintaining the same approach. There's no inconsistency or enlarging of the approach taken here.