Let me answer you specifically.
Yes, of course, officials at the Department of Justice always review these decisions. I review them. We look specifically at the entire decision and how that impacts existing legislation, on future legislation, including this bill that is before us.
To come back to this issue of the test of cruel and unusual punishment and gross disproportionality, I believe, and our officials believe, on balance, that based on the decision in the case involving Quanto that I referred to in my opening remarks, where the judge in that case actually handed down a sentence that was four times more than what we're discussing here as a mandatory minimum, in some ways we already have jurisprudence to look at as a touchstone as to both of those questions, both proportionality, taken in concert with other sentences that occurred at the same time.... And with the issue of cruel and unusual punishment, I would suggest again that that is very instructive and that we go through that test and analysis. The constitutionality, I believe, is sound and would support upholding this particular sentence.