I think I touched on it a little bit. To answer your question from a public point of view—and I'm certainly not speaking for all the public, of course—it was a very wide range of the public that I received feedback from, and they were all very supportive of a need for this, to a point where we had to temper that feedback, in the sense—I think we've touched on it here—that they put it in line with losing a police officer. Personally, as a police officer, I think there is a distinction between the two. Do I love my dog? Absolutely. Is he still a tool? Yes. Does he protect the police officer? For sure. Would I want to lose a police officer over a service dog? No.
However, in the very strongly worded feedback that I received from the public, from Ottawa all the way to Victoria, and from the U.S. as well, they all were saying that something needed to be done. Some were completely awed by the fact that there isn't a bill in place or any legislation at this point.
I do agree with you that the minimums are definitely minimums. Could there in fact be a stronger minimum? I think there's definitely a possibility. Maybe that's something we'll reflect on later, after we see this bill go through, hopefully, but I do think that it's not over the top by any stretch.