I'd have to disagree because when we get to court anything is possible.
We're very fortunate here in Edmonton that we have a special crown that deals with these specific incidents. I think you've heard nationally there's a wide range on the spectrum as to whether these charges are pursued. Was this a high-profile case? Absolutely. Even if it wasn't I think we would have seen the crown lay the charge and pursue it.
What I'm trying to say is that I believe this bill, and the way it's written, will...because it is in very plain language. It's set out clearly as to how to proceed, whether you're a law enforcement laying the charge, or in fact you're the crown prosecutor trying to prove this charge in court. It's two separate things. The likelihood of conviction is always the threshold that everyone is always trying to look at. Can we prove this charge successfully in court?
My belief is that the way this bill is written, a crown prosecutor will be more often successful if the evidence is there to present itself. That's on us as law enforcement to make sure that we do have the evidence there to present the case.
I do believe that even though the bar may be set high, I think it's for a good reason. This whole bill is for a good reason and I do support the way it's written.