I agree. It's going to be the interpretation by the courts. It's probably going to start to define what injured is, as we see in many cases as we get new legislation.
I agree with what Steve has mentioned, that we're dealing with two opposite ends of the spectrum when we're dealing with a service dog that works for the police. Part of the conditioning and testing is to make sure that it does protect itself as well as the handler. We look at the drive of that dog, the defence drive to protect itself if there's going to be a fight. I would venture a guess that it would be very difficult for somebody to try to attempt what may have happened to say, Lucy, if it was a situation with Diane's dog. It probably would not occur with a service animal in our line of work, and the results would be pretty quick.
Again, that comes back to training and conditioning from a very young age. They're conditioning their dogs to make sure that environmentally they're sound; they're very approachable. Again, the drive is there. She's extremely intelligent. Those are all components that we need in all of our dogs, but again, we're looking at different training methods and where we're trying to go with it. I think service animals, definitely, that's where it'll come into play a little bit more than ours.