Okay.
I would like to know whether you have reviewed the case law, which indicates that the sentences handed down by courts have been relatively higher than the minimum sentences set out in the bill. I am not talking about a specific age group, but about judgments of the situation, the individual and the facts involved in the case. If a minimum sentence was imposed that was weaker than the sentences normally handed down by the courts, it could have the opposite effect and result in the case law trend going down instead of up.
Have you looked at what sentences were normally imposed in these kinds of situations? What is the difference with the sentences you are proposing in your legislation?