I have one last question for you on the mandatory minimums on hybrid and dual offences. This will become a hybrid offence, but it states that in order for the prosecution to move forward with a mandatory minimum, they must go by indictment. But any previous offence, which could have been summary, could be used as evidence to move forward with the mandatory minimum.
The crown would have to declare, at the beginning of the trial, whether they're going by indictment or summary, is that correct?