Well, the courts have handed down mixed decisions in the case of mandatory sentences. It really is something that's almost case by case. You have to look at the minimums being imposed and the activities that risk attracting these kinds of minimums. In the Nur case we're talking about firearms. The imposition of the penalty as far as a court was concerned was unconstitutional, but I think in a parallel case they found that another offence with minimums was constitutional.
So the regime that is set up here provides for a number of factors that need to be present for the minimum to be imposed. We believe that those factors, taken together...and it does mean that it requires at least a previous conviction under this legislation, and a minimum quantity of the contraband product to be present for the minimum to be imposed, and then there's a sliding scale of minima. So you start off with the 90 days, and under the normal circumstances it's quite possible that given the presence of all of these factors, a court would impose something around that penalty.
So I'm fairly confident that we put together a rational structure for a minimum penalty.