With respect to your first question about.... First, I just want to comment on what you said about it not being a fast-food restaurant and also not a banquet. We have to take into consideration that Jordan actually takes into account the preliminary hearing; when the Supreme Court gave us the 30 months, that's the limit. It takes into account the preliminary hearing, so if you take out the preliminary hearing, I have a feeling that then the ceiling is going to come down, so it's not going to start immediately at the 30 months.
With respect to the effect on the complainants, again, it's a balancing act, but I think we need to keep in mind the fact that when a person is accused, those are just allegations, and they're innocent until proven guilty. The complainant is not a victim, in my opinion, until that person has been proved guilty in court.
It's a balancing act, and I suppose that's the job of the government to decide what is more important, but in my respectful submission, I think it's extremely important that when an individual is being charged with an offence those are just allegations. We don't know if this person is guilty; otherwise, obviously, we wouldn't need the court system.
We have to balance those rights.