Thank you for bringing that to our attention. That's very helpful.
I'd like to pick up on a question Mr. Rankin was asking regarding the charter. Ms. Smithen was speaking to it.
Reversing the onus at a bail hearing without any fact pattern ever having been tested in court strikes me as fundamentally problematic as far as the presumption of innocence goes. I think there probably would be a charter issue in doing that.
All three of you who've presented have said that you're in favour of doing it. I wonder if you've given thought to the Charter of Rights.