I won't have time, as I say, to go through your point about disproportionate sanctions, but I thought you made a very sound argument there. It seems completely disproportionate; I would agree with you.
One of the other things you talk about is interaction with any provincial or territorial legislation. Quebec has a law and other provinces will soon have laws, one assumes. Certainly, their colleges will have regulations to deal with this.
You say it wouldn't be a concern if the provincial legislation is more restrictive; however it's possible that some provincial frameworks could be less restrictive than Bill C-14. Then access to medical assistance in dying might be affected if practitioners are uncertain about which legislation will prevail based solely on the doctrine of paramountcy. So you're saying that, whatever we do, we should give you some clarity about which rules apply, provincial or federal. Normally, it will be the federal one because of paramountcy but you're saying, wait a second, that might be problematic if it's more restrictive.
Is that correct?