First of all, I also have a question for SALCO. I know that Arif is very proud of it, and rightfully so, but I also take much pride in the fact that you do amazing work in my riding. I'm very grateful that you appeared before us, and your testimony was very helpful.
The one issue I have is that you brought up that you're concerned about the fact that this legislation actually attempts to encourage families to use alternative dispute resolution. However, reading the language, both in proposed section 7.3 and in proposed paragraph 7.7(2)(a), it's pretty obvious that it's not mandatory and it's only meant to occur when it's appropriate.
How concerned should we be that if it's not explicit here that there has been violence, perhaps mistakes will be made and there will be a referral to alternative dispute resolution?