Thank you very much, Mr. Chair.
My thanks to all the witnesses for their contributions to our committee's work.
My question goes to the representatives of the Barreau du Québec. I must react to your conclusion by emphasizing that your work has been very useful for our committee. I particularly appreciated your very comprehensive analysis of the bill and your remarks on the need to reconcile and avoid conflicts between the act and the Civil Code of Québec.
I also appreciated your very concrete recommendations to replace, for example, “ordonnance de contact” with “ordonnance de communication” and to replace “transfert” with “modalités de transition”. I feel that you have well understood the contribution you are making to our work as legislators. We are of one mind about the principle of the best interests of the child, but in one of your recommendations, you mentioned an order of priority in the factors to be considered.
Could you give us some more details about that? You said that care is needed with clause 16. What during your analysis led you to issue that caution?