I think that, from a survey of the case law, even though the Supreme Court of Canada in Gordon v. Goertz says that the reasons for the relocation of the parent shall not be considered except in extenuating circumstances, it's often framed in a different way through the other factors. These are taken into consideration by the court, I would say, and I think that it is relevant to consider the reasons for the parent's moving, but only as it relates to the best interests of the child.
If the relocation is to support a career that would provide an increase in income to better support the child, or the relocation is to take the child to services that would better serve them, I think that those reasons should be taken into account within the context of the best interests of the child.