Understood. Thank you for that.
Now, going back to Ms. Bourke, you also made reference to the burden. You suggested that the parent who is making the application for relocation should bear a burden. Again, that's a departure from Gordon v. Goertz, and the legislation itself is a departure from Gordon v. Goertz in the sense that the court said that it's the burden of the applicant to demonstrate a material change of circumstances in relation to the child, but once that's established, there is no burden. The court looks at any number of factors to ultimately determine whether the relocation is, in fact, in the best interests of the child.
Again, just comment on that distinction or that difference.