We haven't seen it in any of the other legislation, but we had this conversation around the definition of family violence when they were creating the conditional permanent residence.
The reality is that we're at a time and place in the world where cyber-violence is actually one of the main forms of family violence, and we have seen in the past five years, in our cases, that trend coming up over and over: threats of posting things on Facebook, threats of texting and sending intimate photos. You have a golden opportunity here to specifically name it and not say that it is just included in that larger idea of psychological violence.
People like me, who are not as Internet-savvy as my kids are, say it's new, but it's not a new form of violence. However, we are lagging in terms of legislation recognizing it. This would be a great opportunity to actually have that reflection there, because if you speak to clients, the threat of this happening is an actual, on-the-ground, real fear for many clients in the family courts, and it actually impacts their pulling back of their family law claim. Naming it would go a long way.
You don't have our specific brief in front of you. We had submitted it, but it's getting translated. You will see a bit more detail in our brief, which does address the second question around the best interests of the child.