I'll speak to the point raised earlier about children maybe having a risk to voice and needing health professionals to become involved. That is a type of voice that can be elevated to also represent the view of the child.
In terms of conflict, let's say that the best interests—the health, medical, psychological interests—are clear. They are known by a child's direct health team. If that is not being heard, or there are attempts to suppress it in legal proceedings, that is going to be problematic in supporting the child or having that voice come to fruition.
Again, by bringing in that role.... It doesn't necessarily have to be a lawyer directly with a child; it could be a lawyer supported by the health team, but we need to have those pieces in place. After 10 years of being involved in legal proceedings, to be at the end of 10 years and then to have that wonderful support program pop up and stop everything.... I wish it had been here 10 years ago.
In terms of talking about the impact and whether it is going to create more issues, I would say that it's going to stop litigation that's unnecessary or repetitive or not listening to the best interests of the child for their medical and psychological needs.