I'm certainly well familiar with it as I served as a co-chair on that committee and thank you for your acknowledgement that it doesn't square with the language in Carter.
My next question is to Mr. Scher. You talked about the issues of abuse in the Benelux countries. You noted that evidence was before the Supreme Court in Carter, I believe, from Professor Montero's affidavit and perhaps there was other evidence as well.
One of the recommendations that you brought forward here was judicial oversight. I must say that in many ways judicial oversight makes a lot of sense. However, every time the issue comes up, as counter-arguments to it, there are issues related to cost for applicants, for access, ensuring access for persons who meet the criteria, and also timeliness to physician-assisted dying.
How would you respond to those three primary objections, cost, access, and timeliness?