My suggestion was that if you added to, say, proposed section 16.1 that it was as articulated in the convention, then the best interests of the child would be determined by taking into account all the rights of the child in the convention. The list is good, but there other rights in the convention. That's my suggestion about making explicit reference to the convention. The Youth Criminal Justice Act makes reference to the convention. I think it would be appropriate for a family law act to do the same.
You know, particularly as children get older, more of the rights need to be considered when you're doing a best interests determination. It would make it solidly rights-based. We have a mixed history of best interests, if you recall. It was actually best interests that started residential schools. We need to do best interests well.