I understand where this is coming from; however, I go back to the point about the fact that adding presumptions into what is a wholesome view of what is in the best interests of the child can be dangerous.
I note that the courts already take into account the fact that a shared parenting arrangement or maximum parenting time—all of these things—are often weighed already in determining what is in the best interests of the child.
Putting parenting presumptions in the Divorce Act would likely detract from courts focusing on the specific needs of each individual child. I think we've heard plenty of testimony to indicate that these should be considered case by case, and adding presumptions detracts from the overall best interests of the child test.
Therefore, I won't be supporting this amendment.