I appreciate that. However, since there is no reference in the bill to “gender-based violence” and there's no amendment that proposes to include those words, you can't create a definition with no purpose. At that point, I have to rule that this amendment is out of order.
I would suggest that perhaps you could look at Madame Sansoucy's amendment on the next page, which introduces something similar in the realm of “family violence”, which would have been admissible.
Unfortunately, I have to rule the amendment out of order.