Thank you very much.
I have one brief question to CMA. It's a question I've asked all the medical panels that have come before us. Essentially, it follows on Mr. Rankin's question.
When you look at reasonably foreseeable death, if we were to add clarity, if we were to say that the person's death was reasonably foreseeable within the next six months, or a year, based on the model in Oregon, based on the model in all of the states that have passed this type of a law, would that be preferable to you than the vagueness of reasonable foreseeability?