Okay, I don't think there is any more discussion on CPC-2.
(Amendment agreed to [See Minutes of Proceedings])
I guess my legislative adviser is smarter than I am. As I understand, he says we don't have to adopt clause 4 because by adopting the amendment we would create clause 4. I always think that we then still have to do clause 4, but we don't, so clause 4 carries because the amendment carried.
Shall the title of the bill carry?