I think what I would say about that is that the critically important role that the Attorney General has to administer justice and pay attention to the rule of law is the consideration that needs to be uppermost in the Attorney General's mind.
Again, without specific facts before us, it's hard to imagine a circumstance in which, if the Attorney General's independent decision-making were being somehow undermined and the confidence in her or his independent decision-making were being undermined by his or her colleagues, it would be possible to continue to execute this really difficult role that this individual has to play.
Having said that, as I said earlier, the decision should not be rendered in a context in which there might be an individual disagreement about a particular interpretation of the public interest. I think this does have to be a rather serious demonstration of lack of confidence before the Attorney General would take that very dramatic step.
I think I am not quite addressing the first part of your comment. Perhaps you could repeat it for me, because I think I've wandered somewhat away from it.