I think that I agree with them, to the extent that many of those formulations distinguish between the provision of advice, information and considerations of the public interest on the one hand and a sense of pressure on the other.
There is something that I think is interesting, and it is the reason why I mentioned the deferred prosecution agreement factors at the end of my remarks. My colleague from the Université de Sherbrooke made the same point. The way that the provisions with respect to DPAs are worded creates a list of factors that are not appropriate to be considered with respect to offences under the Corruption of Foreign Public Officials Act.
In a sense, there is a bit more direction provided in those provisions of the Criminal Code with respect to what the DPP can or cannot take into account than in a traditional decision to prosecute or not prosecute.