Thank you so much.
It's probably not fair of me to ask, since you're not a lawyer, but we have received a transcript from the Supreme Court explicitly saying that they rejected the concept of “terminally ill”.
I'll move on to a different point concerning judicial oversight. I know you're not a lawyer, but this seems to me to be a typical lawyer answer to a problem: just add more lawyers and it will fix everything. I'll give you the example of a jurisdiction that's to the west of my riding, which is Haldimand County.
It has a small courthouse. The motions court, which would hear applications, sits once a month. The last time I brought an emergency application in the St. Catharines court, which is a much busier jurisdiction, it took me three weeks to see a judge—on an emergency basis.
I'll open this question up. Aren't we just prolonging suffering? Perhaps this is great in the vacuum of legal theory, but we're just prolonging suffering based on judicial resources. Isn't that true?