It would certainly improve it substantially, but in order to ensure its constitutionality, I would remove the entire definition, because it undermines the clear definition, the clear declaration in the Carter decision. The reference to “incurable” is problematic. The reference to the condition being aggravating is problematic. Obviously the clause that troubles me the very most is the reasonable foreseeability one, but if you really want to ensure that the legislation will withstand constitutional scrutiny, I would remove the whole definition.
On May 5th, 2016. See this statement in context.