Thank you.
I think the question of what to do with reporting is a secondary, in a way, to what exactly the standards are against reporting as evaluated. This echoes other comments on the panel.
As I mentioned in my testimony, I think there's a healthy discussion right now about the terms set by these online platforms for participation in them. I think there's a real need to reconsider what those terms are and for that reconsideration to be done not only in response to government regulation, but also in consultation with local and community groups and with reference to international human rights standards.
I don't think it's a simple technical issue, but a reconsideration of exactly what is acceptable and what the standards are that are used to evaluate acceptable speech on these platforms.