I agree with what Mr. Rankin said and I remember that testimony.
With regard to it being on a reasonableness standard, it is an objective standard, which is a higher standard obviously than the subjective. With regard to criminality, exempting this person doesn't mean there's no sanction involved. Obviously there are sanctions later on in the bill that deal with the fact that somebody who maybe had a reasonable but mistaken belief who didn't follow the criteria set out in this bill wouldn't be held to account.
I believe that this amendment is unnecessary and goes against the spirit of the bill and I won't be voting for it.