One alternative model has occurred to me and I'd be interested in your feedback. If someone is at the extreme level of a Whatcott or Your Ward News, we bring to bear the criminal law or some more appropriate financial sanction through the Canadian Human Rights Act, if section 13 in some fashion were to be revisited. However, for someone who just posts a hateful comment online once, wouldn't it be more appropriate and efficient to have an administrative system that is flexible and efficient, that would say there's going to be a $30 to $50 fine and don't do it again?
I hear about the education piece and I want to stop the big hate speech, obviously, but it's the people in their basements who post a one-off comment on Twitter in reply and there's no way to hold that person accountable. How do we effectively hold that person accountable?