Thank you, Mr. Chair, and thank you to the witnesses.
I'll begin with Mr. Arnot.
Mr. Arnot, you made reference to the Ahenakew case. That particular case was based on a complex set of facts, including whether the conversation was a private one, which it was ultimately determined not to be, and also, whether Mr. Ahenakew was prodded by a journalist, which went to the question of intent.
In light of that, would you characterize the actions of Mr. Warman to have been ethical and appropriate?