That was a decision made by Parliament. We weren't involved in all of the discussions. Our information was that there had been one complaint that was filed with the commission. It was not of neo-Nazi ideology. It was not extreme. It was dismissed. However, it caused a reaction as it was a complaint against a magazine.
There were issues with the complaint being filed, both in provincial jurisdiction because it was a print magazine, but also they had an online presence, which meant we then had jurisdiction as well.
There were some issues there. If the committee is looking at any type of reinstatement, those issues of jurisdiction would need to be addressed, because respondents then have to defend themselves in several fora, which is not ideal.