I take Ms. May's point well.
I agree that there might be a slight difference there with the words “but only” and I don't think that necessarily provides or adds anything to what is being attempted in my amendment LIB-5.
I like Mr. Falk's wording in amendment CPC-20.1, “may do so in the person's presence on the person's behalf and under the person's”—I would add “express”—direction. However, I would be amenable to that wording, and perhaps we could propose a subamendment to Ms. May's amendment.