Thank you, and I appreciate the amending motion.
I believe a five-year review, which is what is in C-14, would be a more appropriate time for us to review.
The legislation has to be up and running for a reasonable length of time for us to be able to spot problems and changes that are necessary.
If a standing committee of justice wants to after a couple of years say how is it going, and we want to discuss the issue of advance directives and minors, that would be appropriate, but for it to be in the legislation is presumptive. I think it would be more appropriate to stick with C-14 and a five-year review.