Fair enough.
We're going to move to the vote on PV-11.
(Amendment negatived [See Minutes of Proceedings])
We will then go to CPC-25.1. It's new, so let me look at it.
Mr. Viersen, I'm sorry that I keep having these issues with the amendments that only you seem to put forward, but there's a real issue of receivability again on this amendment, with respect to the scope and the intention of requiring a court of appeal to rule first.
To be flexible, why don't I let you at least argue your amendment? If you could try to explain to me why you believe it's receivable, I'll listen to you.