Anthony Housefather at the Justice and Human Rights Committee

On May 10th, 2016. See this statement in context.

May 10th, 2016 / 5:45 p.m.

Liberal

The Chair Liberal Anthony Housefather

Next we move to clause 7.

(On clause 7)

My ruling on CPC-29 is that it's incidental to CPC-1 and CPC-4 that were ruled unreceivable. As a result, CPC-29 cannot go forward, because it would have presumed that we have done something that we have not done in the other two amendments.

The bells are going for the vote. Could I suggest that we do CPC-29.1 and then go to the vote, and then we'll come back?

I need unanimous consent to carry on once the bells start ringing. Do I have unanimous consent of the committee members to do that?

See context to find out what was said next.