I agree with that. I don't believe that the Green motion can be withdrawn in that way. It should be voted on. I can't rule it out of order, because the words are actually in the bill. She's substituting one word from the bill for another word from the bill, so theoretically it is receivable, but I think it's easy, if we just debate or vote.
Is there anybody who wishes to debate this one?
(Amendment negatived [See Minutes of Proceedings])
Amendment NDP-5 is withdrawn.
Now we come to amendment CPC-35.2.
Mr. Falk.