I think you're referencing the Schmidt case, which came down.
As all ministers of justice do, I take my responsibilities under section 4.1 of the Department of Justice Act very seriously in terms of providing reports on whether or not legislation that is introduced is in compliance with the Charter of Rights and Freedoms, and we will continue to meet our reporting obligations.
In addition to that, I'll say as minister that when introducing government legislation, we have provided and will continue to provide an analysis or an explanatory paper about how legislation has been developed—as we have with respect to medical assistance in dying.
What I've instructed and what we are going to continue to do is ensure that as much as possible we provide explanations to Canadians about the thinking and considerations that have gone into legislation, as well as the considerations or risks in terms of the charter that may or may not exist with respect to a piece of legislation, and to invite parliamentarians certainly and Canadians into the conversation about public policy decisions and the reasons explaining why public policy decisions have been made.
That's a commitment we will continue to move forward on, not only with medical assistance in dying, but with other legislation that is going to be introduced in the very near future.