British Columbia, for example, rarely uses the Criminal Code for the enforcement of impaired driving. They are using their own provincial administrative schemes whereby there is instantaneous suspension of the licence and actual impoundment of the car at the roadside. They're basically using the Criminal Code provisions only for repeat offenders or very serious repeat offenders. For first-time offenders, they're using their provincial administrative legislation. I understand from the statistics they have that this has had a significant impact on the impaired driving rates.
Again, as indicated earlier, it's not simply a question of penalty. It's also a question of how quickly the penalty is imposed proximate to the offence. When you get the penalty right at the roadside, you feel it right away. It's not like something happens 10 months later and you go to court. In fact, probably the biggest pain of going to court 10 months later is not the fine; it's paying the lawyer's fee.